One of my recommendations for new major gift fundraisers is to go visit a college phonathon program. There you will see what it is like to build rapport fast, ask without fear, overcome objections, and get told “No” a lot.

And I mean a lot! A rock-star student caller calling future donors (alums that have as yet not made a gift to their alma mater) experience 80% refusals.

Major gift officers have a huge advantage over these incredible student fundraisers. They get the benefit of building a long-term organic relationship before asking.

But what the callers get is practice getting comfortable with rejection. That will serve every one of them well no matter what career they go into. And they get that through repetition, getting a sustained volume of asks in a short period of time.

What those callers get is PRACTICE. That’s the antidote to anxiety.

That said, if you want to reduce anxiety around fundraising, I’m going to suggest something that sounds completely counterintuitive.

Start trying to get more nos.

I’m serious.

Rack them up.
​
Because most hesitation in fundraising has very little to do with strategy. It has everything to do with the fear of rejection.

When board members say they are uncomfortable asking for money, what they usually mean is this:

“I don’t want to be told no.”

That no feels personal. It feels like failure. It feels like embarrassment. It feels like confirmation that we asked for too much.

But here’s the truth: Your job is not to secure a yes. Your job is to make the invitation. The outcome belongs to the donor. That distinction changes everything.

Years ago, when I was working directly with student fundraisers, I would sometimes flip their entire goal for the night. Perhaps we were calling a tough group and I knew they would have trouble keeping their motivation high. Instead of focusing on getting pledges, I would say:

“Rack up your nos.”

Every no meant they were actually doing the work. Every no meant they were having real conversations. Every no meant they were one step closer to a yes.

The goal wasn’t perfection.

The goal was practice.

When students focused on collecting no’s instead of avoiding them, something remarkable happened. Their anxiety dropped. Their confidence rose. Their activity increased.

And guess what followed?

More yeses.

Not because they pressured harder.
​
Because they showed up more.

Here’s something else that surprises people. In relationship-based major gift fundraising, you rarely get a full and final no. What you usually get is nuance.

• “I can’t do $50,000 this year, but I could consider $25,000.”
• “Not this quarter, but let’s revisit in six months.”
• “This project isn’t my focus, but I care deeply about scholarships.”

That is not rejection. That is conversation.

When you interpret every hesitation as a personal rejection, you shut down. When you understand it as information, you lean in.

You adjust the amount.
You adjust the timing.
You adjust the focus.
​
Fundraising is not a courtroom verdict. It is an evolving dialogue.

The truth is you cannot control the outcome of an ask.

You can control:

• Your preparation
• Your clarity
• Your alignment with the donor’s interests
• Your courage to call the question

Once you’ve done those things, you have done your job.

The donor’s response is theirs to own.

When you detach your identity from the outcome, asking becomes lighter. It becomes cleaner. It becomes far less intimidating.
​
And ironically, that calm confidence often increases your success rate.

If your board is paralyzed by the fear of rejection, they will delay. They will hedge and soften. They will avoid and procrastinate.

If you reframe the goal from “secure every yes” to “engage in real conversations,” the pressure drops.

You begin to measure success differently:

• Did we show up prepared?
• Did we make a clear, values-aligned invitation?
• Did we listen carefully to the response?
• Did we follow up thoughtfully?

That is success.

Yeses follow consistency.

Consistency requires courage.
​
Courage grows when rejection loses its sting.

At your next board meeting, try this:

Ask each board member to identify one meaningful fundraising action they can take in the next 30 days.

Not a perfect action. Not a guaranteed yes. Just an action.

Then celebrate activity, not just outcomes.
​
When you normalize nos as part of the process, you create a culture of momentum instead of a culture of avoidance.

If your board is stuck in fear of rejection, let’s work through that together.

In a complimentary Board Fundraising Alignment Call, we can examine where emotional friction slows down momentum and build a plan to create a confident, fundraising-positive culture.

Rejection is not the enemy of fundraising.

Inactivity is.

Rack up your nos.

They lead straight to your yeses.
​
Cheers!

P.S. This post is part of an ongoing series for nonprofit CEOs and Board Chairs who want to build confident, fundraising-positive boards.

If this conversation is resonating, I invite you to subscribe so you don’t miss the next installment. My goal is to give you practical tools you can use at your next board meeting. Each piece builds on the last, and together they form a practical roadmap for strengthening fundraising culture at the leadership level. Next week’s piece tackles one of the most misunderstood parts of board fundraising.

If you liked this…

• Asking Is Only 5%: Why Your Board Is Afraid of the Wrong Thing
• Fundraising is a Noble Endeavor: Why Board Beliefs Drive Revenue (Or Lack Thereof)
• The 3 Rs of Fundraising Mindset: What It Really Takes to Talk About Money
• Separate Your Emotions from Other People’s Money
• Rethinking Board Recruitment: The 4 Ws That Really Matter

There is one mindset shift that can dramatically change how a nonprofit board approaches fundraising. (All credit for this phrasing goes to my friend, Justin Ferrell, who used it to get his student fundraisers to become more comfortable asking.)

Separate your emotions from other people’s money.

When I say that in a workshop, I can almost feel the room pause. It sounds simple. It is not.

Most anxiety around fundraising has very little to do with the mission.
​
It has everything to do with money.

Every one of us carries a money story.

Maybe you grew up in scarcity. Maybe money was tight, unpredictable, or a source of tension. Maybe you were taught that talking about money is impolite. Maybe you still live carefully, thoughtfully, responsibly.

Those experiences shape how you feel when you hear or say a large dollar amount.

But they are not universal.

For someone with significant wealth, a major gift may not represent sacrifice. It may represent alignment. It may represent legacy. It may represent an opportunity to use what they have been entrusted with to create positive change.

When a board member or nonprofit leader says, “I could never ask someone for that much,” what they are usually revealing is their own internal discomfort.
​
They are imagining how that amount would feel to them. That is projection and projection creates hesitation. Hesitation softens clarity. And soft asks rarely inspire confident gifts. Leadership requires you to notice that dynamic and step beyond it.

When you separate your emotions from other people’s money, you shift your posture.

You stop imagining that you are taking something from someone.

You begin to recognize that you are offering someone an opportunity to participate in something meaningful.
​
For many donors, giving is about:

• Expressing values
• Investing in long-term impact
• Honoring a loved one
• Creating legacy
• Strengthening community

Money is simply the tool that allows those values to take shape. Your responsibility is not to protect donors from their own generosity. Your responsibility is to articulate the mission clearly and invite them into it. The decision belongs to them.

This is where another reframing becomes powerful.

Your job is not to get the money.

Your job is to make the invitation.

That distinction reduces anxiety immediately.

When I worked with student fundraisers, I taught them to “rack up your nos.” Every no meant they were doing the work. Every no moved them closer to a yes. The goal was not perfection. The goal was forward movement, presenting the needs of the institution to interested parties.

Interestingly, in relationship-based major gift fundraising, you rarely receive a full and final no. What you receive instead is nuance.

A different amount.
A different timeline.
A different philanthropic priority.

That is not rejection. That is conversation.

When you detach your self-worth and your personal money story from the outcome, the conversation becomes lighter. More curious. More collaborative.

You are no longer carrying the emotional weight of the answer.
​
You are simply facilitating alignment.

As a nonprofit CEO or Board Chair, this mindset is not just personal. It is cultural.

If you shrink from big numbers, your board will shrink.

If you speak about fundraising with quiet apology, your board will mirror that tone.

If you model calm confidence and trust in the process, your board will follow.

I often remind leaders: if you work the process, the process will work.

The donor cycle exists to create structure. Identification. Qualification. Cultivation. Asking. Stewardship. Re-engagement. When you honor each phase, you reduce desperation and increase clarity.

Mindset is the foundation that allows the system to function.

Without it, every ask feels personal.
​
With it, fundraising feels strategic and purposeful.

If your board seems anxious around major gifts, ask:

• Are we projecting our own financial experiences onto our donors?
• Are we assuming sacrifice where there may be alignment?
• Are we carrying emotional weight that does not belong to us?

Naming this dynamic out loud can be transformative.
​
Emotional maturity in fundraising does not mean becoming detached or cold. It means becoming steady. It means trusting that donors are capable of making their own decisions. It means leading with clarity instead of projection.

If you sense that money narratives are quietly shaping your board’s engagement, let’s explore that together.

In a complimentary Board Fundraising Alignment Call, we can examine where emotional friction is slowing momentum and build a plan to create a confident, fundraising-positive culture.

Separating your emotions from other people’s money is not cold. It is respectful. It allows donors to decide. And it allows you to lead.
​
Cheers!

P.S. This post is the first part of an ongoing series for nonprofit CEOs and Board Chairs who want to build confident, fundraising-positive boards.

If this conversation is resonating, I invite you to subscribe so you don’t miss the next installment. My goal is to give you practical tools you can use at your next board meeting. Each piece builds on the last, and together they form a practical roadmap for strengthening fundraising culture at the leadership level.

If you liked this…

• Asking Is Only 5%: Why Your Board Is Afraid of the Wrong Thing
• Fundraising is a Noble Endeavor: Why Board Beliefs Drive Revenue (Or Lack Thereof)
• The 3 Rs of Fundraising Mindset: What It Really Takes to Talk About Money
• Your Board Wants to Help with Fundraising – They Just Don’t Know How
• Rethinking Board Recruitment: The 4 Ws That Really Matter

The Donor Cycle is one of the most grounding frameworks in fundraising. It gives structure to something that can otherwise feel mysterious or intimidating.

One graph I love shows the percentages that fundraisers stay in each stage. Notice how small the solicitation slice is (green) compared to cultivation and stewardship (pink and grey).
​
And almost without fail, when I put this chart up on the screen, I see shoulders relax.

Because most of the anxiety around fundraising comes down to one moment.

The moment when someone has to open their mouth and ask.

Of course, boards fixate on the ask. It feels exposed, vulnerable and high-stakes. I understand that fear. Asking requires courage, clarity, and the willingness to hear “no.”

And it is absolutely essential.

But here is the truth that surprises nearly everyone:

Asking is only 5% of the donor cycle.

Five percent.
​
That slice is much smaller than most board members imagine. And when leadership and boards misunderstand that, they either avoid fundraising entirely or approach it with unnecessary tension.

The donor cycle is simply a way of visualizing and systematizing how philanthropic relationships grow over time.

It begins with Identification. This is where you clarify who is most likely to care and most able to invest.

Next comes Qualification. After meeting potential supporters, you determine whether there is genuine alignment and readiness.

Then we move into Cultivation. I often call this “platonic dating.” This is relationship-building without pressure. You meet for coffee. You invite them to events. You share impact stories. You listen. You learn what matters to them. You help them understand the mission more deeply.

Cultivation is where trust is built.

After cultivation comes Solicitation, the Ask. This is where you make a direct request for a gift. The key is values alignment. The request reflects the relationship that has already been built.

Then comes Stewardship, or what I like to call “Thank and Recognize.” You celebrate shared impact. You communicate clearly about results. You express sincere gratitude.

Finally, you re-engage. You begin the cultivation process again, deepening the relationship over time.

When you look at how time is actually distributed across this cycle, about 80% of it is spent in cultivation and stewardship. Relationship-building and gratitude.

Asking? Five percent.

It is not the everyday.
​
It is an inflection point.

One of my former bosses is a minister. When I first walked her through the donor cycle and showed her that asking represented such a small portion of the overall process, she was visibly relieved.

She had a significant ask coming up with a donor we had spent considerable time cultivating. We had met with this donor multiple times. We understood her interests. She understood our vision. There was genuine trust in the relationship.

We practiced the ask beforehand. We went into the meeting prepared. That preparation eased some of her anxiety.

Afterward, she could not stop talking about how organic and authentic it felt. Of course, it felt that way. The relationship had already been built. The ask was simply the next logical step in a shared conversation. And yes, it was successful.
​
That is how fundraising should feel. Relationship first.

Board members often imagine fundraising as a constant state of asking. As if they will be pressured to request money in every conversation.

That is not how healthy fundraising works.

Healthy fundraising looks like:

• Listening carefully
• Sharing stories of impact
• Connecting mission to values
• Expressing gratitude
• Deepening trust

Then, at the right moment, calling the question.

You do have to call the question. That step is essential. You do have to follow up appropriately and secure an answer. Fundraising is not passive.

But when you understand that the ask sits within a much larger relational framework, it becomes far less intimidating.
​
It becomes purposeful. Graceful. Aligned.

If your board is anxious about fundraising, start by teaching the donor cycle.

Help them see that asking is not a daily burden. It is a small, strategic part of a much larger relationship-building process.

Invite them into cultivation. Encourage thank-you calls. Create opportunities for shared impact stories. Let them experience the joy of stewardship.

When board members realize that most of fundraising is about connection and gratitude, something shifts.

The ask stops feeling like a cliff.

It starts feeling like a bridge.
​
And bridges are meant to be crossed.

If your board feels stuck at the word “ask,” let’s unpack that together.

In 30 minutes, we’ll pinpoint where fear is creeping in and outline a clear path to board confidence. I’m opening three complimentary Board Fundraising Alignment Calls this month. You can reserve a time here.

Fundraising is consistent relationship building, not constant asking.

And when you understand that, the entire experience becomes lighter, clearer, and far more effective.

Cheers!

P.S. This post is the first part of an ongoing series for nonprofit CEOs and Board Chairs who want to build confident, fundraising-positive boards.

If this conversation is resonating, I invite you to subscribe so you don’t miss the next installment. My goal is to give you practical tools you can use at your next board meeting. Each piece builds on the last, and together they form a practical roadmap for strengthening fundraising culture at the leadership level.

If you liked this… 

• Fundraising is a Noble Endeavor: Why Board Beliefs Drive Revenue (Or Lack Thereof)
• Your Board Wants to Help with Fundraising – They Just Don’t Know How
• Rethinking Board Recruitment: The 4 Ws That Really Matter
• Culture of Philanthropy Check-Up
• The 3 Rs of Fundraising Mindset: What It Really Takes to Talk About Money